Colorado Capitol Coverage
Assembly Required
All bills
In CommitteeSB26-0132026 Regular Session

Colorado is Quietly Changing Its Bigamy Law—Here's What That Actually Means

Sponsors: Nick Hinrichsen, Janice Marchman, Yara Zokaie·Judiciary·

Editorial photograph for SB26-013

Illustration: Assembly Required

The Bottom Line

Colorado is updating its bigamy laws so that a legally married person who lives with a new partner isn't technically committing a crime. It removes "cohabitation" from the criminal definition of bigamy, bringing the state's legal code in line with modern relationships and drawn-out divorce realities.

What This Bill Actually Does

Under current Colorado law, bigamy isn't just secretly marrying two people at the courthouse. According to CRS 18-6-201, a married person (or someone in a civil union) commits a Class 2 misdemeanor if they live with another person "under the representation of being married." In legal speak, that's called cohabitation. This means that if you are separated from your spouse but legally still married, and you move in with a new partner while holding yourselves out as a couple, you are technically committing a crime.

SB26-013 takes a red pen to this statute. It completely strips the words "cohabits" and "cohabitation" from the state's bigamy laws. Furthermore, it repeals Section 18-6-203, which is the specific part of the code that defines cohabitation as living together under the representation of being married. By making these changes, the bill narrows the legal definition of bigamy down to its traditional, core meaning: fraudulently holding multiple legally recognized marriage licenses or civil unions at the exact same time.

The problem this solves is primarily one of legal modernization. Our current laws were written in an era with different social expectations. Today, divorce proceedings can drag on for months or even years. Many separated individuals naturally move on and establish households with new partners before a judge formally signs the final divorce decree. Under the old law, a vindictive ex could theoretically accuse their estranged spouse of a misdemeanor just for moving in with someone new. This bill removes that specific legal threat, ensuring the criminal justice system stays out of messy breakups and non-traditional living arrangements.

What It Means for You

For the vast majority of Coloradans, this bill is about peace of mind. If you are currently navigating a complicated, drawn-out divorce and have already moved in with a new partner, you've technically been living in a legal gray area. Because bigamy is a Class 2 misdemeanor, carrying potential fines and jail time, this law was a lingering liability. By removing cohabitation from the criminal code, the state is making it clear that your living arrangements during a separation are not a criminal matter.

This also has significant implications for Colorado's ethically non-monogamous and polyamorous communities. Until now, living with multiple partners and referring to them in ways that could be construed as "representing yourselves as married" opened the door to technical criminal charges. SB26-013 officially decriminalizes this type of cohabitation, bringing state law more in line with modern household structures. However, let's be perfectly clear about what this does not do: it does not legalize multiple simultaneous marriages. If you try to file a second marriage certificate at the county clerk's office while still legally married to your first spouse, you are still committing a crime.

Here is what you should consider doing if this impacts your household:

  • Review your custody agreements: If you were holding off on moving in with a new partner because a hostile ex-spouse threatened to use the cohabitation law against you in family court, this changes the playing field. Consult your family law attorney.
  • Weigh in before the final vote: The bill is currently sitting in the House Judiciary Committee. If this modernization matters to you—or if you strongly oppose it—call or email the committee members this week before they schedule their vote.

What It Means for Your Business

You might be wondering why a business owner should care about a bigamy law. If you run a family law practice, a divorce mediation firm, or an estate planning agency, this bill directly changes the tactical landscape for your clients. Historically, the threat of a bigamy charge—however unlikely to be prosecuted—has sometimes been weaponized in high-conflict divorces or contentious custody battles. Private investigators are occasionally hired to document "cohabitation" to gain leverage in settlements. Once SB26-013 passes, that specific legal leverage evaporates. Your attorneys will need to update their advisements to clients currently undergoing long-term separations.

For those in real estate, property management, and corporate HR, this is a signal to review your internal paperwork. Property managers frequently use boilerplate lease agreements that include outdated "morality clauses" prohibiting tenants from using the property for illegal acts, which technically included cohabitation under the old bigamy statute. Similarly, HR departments managing domestic partner benefits should note that the state is relaxing its legal scrutiny on non-traditional households. When the state removes legal stigmas around cohabitation, corporate policies usually follow suit.

Here are your immediate action items for this week:

  • Audit your boilerplate documents: If you manage rental properties or draft leases, review your standard agreements. Remove any archaic language that references cohabitation or attempts to enforce marital status on leaseholders.
  • Brief your legal team: If you are in the family law or private investigation sector, hold a brief staff meeting to ensure everyone understands that documenting cohabitation will no longer imply criminal bigamy as of August 2026.

Follow the Money

When it comes to the state budget, this bill is practically invisible. According to the official Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note drafted by Clayton Mayfield, the state anticipates a grand total of $0 in new revenue and $0 in new expenditures for both FY 2026-27 and beyond. There is absolutely no impact on your taxes, no required appropriations, and no change to TABOR refunds.

Why is the fiscal impact nonexistent? Because district attorneys almost never enforce the current law anyway. The state's comparable crime analysis revealed that between FY 2022-23 and FY 2024-25, exactly one person in the entire state of Colorado was sentenced and convicted for this specific offense. Since the baseline rate of prosecution is functionally zero, removing the crime from the books won't result in any meaningful savings for the courts, public defenders, or county jails. It is essentially a paperwork cleanup that costs taxpayers nothing.

Where This Bill Stands

This legislation is on the fast track and moving with virtually zero friction. Introduced in the Senate on January 14, 2026, by Sen. Nick Hinrichsen and Sen. Janice Marchman, it breezed through the Senate Judiciary Committee unamended. By February 11, 2026, the full Senate passed it on the third reading without a single amendment.

As of February 12, 2026, the bill has crossed over to the House, sponsored by Rep. Yara Zokaie, and is currently assigned to the House Judiciary Committee. Given its smooth, unamended passage in the Senate and its zero-dollar fiscal note, its trajectory toward the Governor's desk looks highly favorable. Barring any unexpected political hurdles or citizen referendum petitions, the law is slated to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on August 12, 2026 (which is 90 days after the projected end of the legislative session). If you want to testify or submit written comments, you need to contact the House Judiciary Committee immediately before they schedule their hearing.

The Opportunity Signal

Where this bill creates practical upside for operators: the opening, the key constraints, and the move to make while the window is still favorable.

  • Proactive Lease Agreement Modernization

    The decriminalization of cohabitation in Colorado, set to take effect in August 2026, removes the legal basis for 'morality clauses' in lease agreements that prohibit tenants from living with a partner while still legally married to another. Property managers and landlords can reduce their legal exposure and attract a broader tenant base by proactively updating their standard lease documents. This change signals a broader shift in legal and social acceptance of diverse household structures, making it opportune to align property policies with modern norms and prevent potential disputes arising from outdated clauses.

    • Eliminates the criminal basis for 'morality clauses' tied to cohabitation in rental agreements.
    • Reduces legal risk and potential litigation from outdated or discriminatory lease terms.
    • Positions properties to attract tenants in diverse household arrangements without legal friction.

    Next move: Engage legal counsel within the next 30 days to review and revise all standard lease agreements, ensuring any clauses referencing cohabitation or marital status representations are updated or removed.

  • Family Law Advisory Update

    With the threat of a bigamy charge based on cohabitation now removed, family law attorneys and divorce mediators must immediately update their client advisories. This eliminates a specific, albeit rarely prosecuted, piece of leverage that was sometimes used in high-conflict divorce or custody battles. Practitioners should refine their strategic guidance, shifting focus to other legal and financial implications of post-separation cohabitation, such as its impact on alimony, property division, or child custody, based on non-criminal considerations.

    • Removes the 'cohabitation as bigamy' threat from legal leverage in divorce proceedings.
    • Requires attorneys to update strategic advice for clients navigating long-term separations.
    • Opportunity to educate clients on non-criminal factors of cohabitation impacting family law cases.

    Next move: Schedule an internal professional development session within the next two weeks for all family law practitioners to review SB26-013's impact and align on updated client advisories and negotiation strategies.

  • HR Policy Review for Inclusive Benefits

    The state's move to decriminalize cohabitation signals a broader relaxation of legal scrutiny on non-traditional households. Corporate HR departments, particularly those managing domestic partner benefits or codes of conduct, should seize this opportunity to review and modernize their internal policies. Aligning company policies with the new legal landscape can reduce potential for legal challenges, reinforce an inclusive workplace culture, and enhance the company's ability to attract and retain talent from diverse relationship backgrounds.

    • State's legal stance on cohabitation is relaxing, influencing corporate policy evolution.
    • Outdated HR policies may create unnecessary friction or compliance risks.
    • Opportunity to enhance inclusivity and appeal to a broader talent pool.

    Next move: Convene an HR policy review committee within the next 4 weeks to identify and propose revisions to any domestic partner benefit eligibility criteria or employee conduct policies that may conflict with the state's updated stance on cohabitation.

Get the Wednesday briefing

Colorado legislature coverage, in plain language. Free.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does SB26-013 do?
Currently in Colorado, it is considered bigamy—a misdemeanor crime—to live with someone as if you are married while you are still legally married to someone else. This bill changes the law so that simply living together (cohabiting) is no longer a crime. Under this bill, bigamy only applies if you actually go through a formal legal marriage or civil union with a new person while still legally married to another.
What is the current status of SB26-013?
SB26-013 is currently "In Committee" in the 2026 Regular Session. It was introduced by Nick Hinrichsen and is assigned to the Judiciary committee.
Who sponsors SB26-013?
SB26-013 is sponsored by Nick Hinrichsen, Janice Marchman, Yara Zokaie.
How does SB26-013 affect Colorado businesses?
The decriminalization of cohabitation in Colorado, set to take effect in August 2026, removes the legal basis for 'morality clauses' in lease agreements that prohibit tenants from living with a partner while still legally married to another. Property managers and landlords can reduce their legal exposure and attract a broader tenant base by proactively updating their standard lease documents. This change signals a broader shift in legal and social acceptance of diverse household structures, making it opportune to align property policies with modern norms and prevent potential disputes arising from outdated clauses. With the threat of a bigamy charge based on cohabitation now removed, family law attorneys and divorce mediators must immediately update their client advisories. This eliminates a specific, albeit rarely prosecuted, piece of leverage that was sometimes used in high-conflict divorce or custody battles. Practitioners should refine their strategic guidance, shifting focus to other legal and financial implications of post-separation cohabitation, such as its impact on alimony, property division, or child custody, based on non-criminal considerations. The state's move to decriminalize cohabitation signals a broader relaxation of legal scrutiny on non-traditional households. Corporate HR departments, particularly those managing domestic partner benefits or codes of conduct, should seize this opportunity to review and modernize their internal policies. Aligning company policies with the new legal landscape can reduce potential for legal challenges, reinforce an inclusive workplace culture, and enhance the company's ability to attract and retain talent from diverse relationship backgrounds.
What committee is reviewing SB26-013?
SB26-013 is assigned to the Judiciary committee in the Colorado Senate.
When was SB26-013 last updated?
The last action on SB26-013 was "House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole" on 03/04/2026.

Related Bills