All bills
Signed Into LawHB26-11342026 Regular Session

Facing a City Ordinance Violation? How HB26-1134 Changes the Rules for Local Courts.

Sponsors: Javier Mabrey, Elizabeth Velasco, Judy Amabile, Mike Weissman·Judiciary·

Editorial photograph for HB26-1134

Illustration: Assembly Required

The Bottom Line

If you or someone you know ever ends up in a local municipal court—think severe traffic tickets, local ordinance violations, or minor skirmishes—the rules of the game just changed. This new law guarantees free livestreaming for hearings involving jail time and ensures anyone stuck in custody gets a public defender who is paid fairly to actually fight for them.

What This Bill Actually Does

Municipal courts handle thousands of cases across Colorado every year, but because they operate at the city or town level, they often fly under the radar compared to state or federal courts. Historically, if someone was sitting in a local jail for a municipal offense, their hearings might not have been livestreamed to the public due to "technical difficulties," and the public defenders representing them were sometimes paid flat fees. Critics of the flat-fee system argue it disincentivizes defense attorneys from spending adequate time on complex cases, since they get paid the same amount whether they work two hours or twenty.

Here is the part that matters: HB26-1134 strips away the excuses and standardizes the rights of municipal defendants to match those in state courts. If a defendant is in custody and facing a municipal charge that carries possible jail time, the court must livestream the proceeding for free in real-time. The law explicitly states that intermittent internet or technology staffing issues are no longer valid reasons to shut the public out of these specific hearings. It even goes as far as overruling previous state judicial guidance (Chief Justice Directive 23-02) that previously allowed courts to limit remote observation.

On the legal defense side, the bill ensures defendants are presumed indigent if they are in custody facing potential jail time, meaning they automatically get a public defender. It forces local jails to give these attorneys advance access to their clients and pretrial files before they ever step in front of a judge. Furthermore, it completely bans municipalities from paying defense attorneys on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure, requiring them to pay hourly rates that match state-level defenders. Finally, the bill drops the hammer on municipal courts that are "not of record" (smaller local courts that don't keep verbatim transcripts), completely stripping them of their authority to sentence anyone to jail.

What It Means for You

As a resident, you might never plan to see the inside of a municipal courtroom. But if you do—or if a family member does—this legislation fundamentally protects your constitutional rights and pulls local justice out of the shadows. If your teenager or neighbor is held in custody on a municipal charge, you won't have to drive down to the local courthouse and hope the doors are open to see what is happening. You can watch the proceedings online, in real-time, for free. The strict guarantee of remote public viewing means that judges and prosecutors are operating in the light, even when local internet connections are spotty.

The other massive shift for everyday Coloradans is the guarantee of immediate, prepared legal representation. Before this change, you might have had to jump through bureaucratic hoops to prove you couldn't afford an attorney while sitting in a jail cell. Now, if you are in custody and facing potential jail time, you are automatically presumed indigent. An attorney will be appointed to you, and the jail must give them time to meet with you before your bond hearing. You aren't just getting a lawyer in name only; you are getting someone who has actually been given the time and files to understand your case.

Have you ever heard of someone getting stuck in jail for days on a minor warrant from another city? This law tackles that, too. It requires courts to hold a hearing within 48 hours when a municipal hold is placed, and forces courts to make "diligent efforts" to resolve these matters promptly, even if you are locked up in a different county for something else. Also, if you happen to live in a smaller town with a "not of record" municipal court, you can breathe a little easier: those specific courts can no longer legally sentence anyone to incarceration. Period.

What It Means for Your Business

For most traditional business owners—restaurants, retail, construction—this bill won't change your daily operations. However, if your business operates in the legal services, IT, or courtroom technology sectors, this is a massive green light. Municipalities across Colorado are suddenly on the hook to upgrade their audiovisual equipment and broadband capabilities because the "we have bad internet" excuse is now legally dead for in-custody hearings. Keep an eye out for a surge in local government RFPs (Requests for Proposals) for participatory web conferencing tools, camera systems, and ongoing AV tech support.

If you run a private law firm that contracts with municipalities to provide indigent defense, your business model needs an immediate adjustment. The bill explicitly outlaws the fixed or flat-fee payment structure for public defense contracts in municipal courts. If you were taking a flat $2,000 a month to handle all local indigent cases for a town, that contract must be rewritten. You now have the right to be paid at rates that match the state's Office of Alternate Defense Counsel—which generally means moving to an hourly billing model that compensates you fairly for the actual time and effort you put into each specific case.

From an HR and workforce management perspective, this bill might actually help your employees resolve legal trouble faster and miss less work. By forcing courts to address municipal holds quickly and mandating remote hearing options, an employee who gets caught up in a local ordinance violation—say, a severe traffic issue or a noise complaint—has a much better chance of getting their case handled promptly. Instead of languishing in a neighboring county's jail waiting for a transfer and missing a week of shifts, the new 48-hour hearing rules and virtual options mean they can navigate the justice system and get back to their lives.

Follow the Money

The tab for this transparency and fairness overhaul falls almost entirely on local governments. According to the nonpartisan fiscal note, there is zero fiscal impact on the state budget, largely because state-level courts already comply with these rigorous standards.

But for cities and towns, this acts as an unfunded mandate. Municipalities that currently use technology exemptions to avoid livestreaming will have to open their wallets for new camera systems, software licenses, and IT staff. Additionally, by forcing cities to abandon flat-fee contracts and match state hourly rates for public defenders, many local governments will see their legal budgets spike. Town councils and city managers will have to figure out how to absorb these new, unpredictable hourly legal fees into their annual municipal budgets, which could eventually trickle down to local taxpayers or result in budget shifts away from other local programs.

Where This Bill Stands

HB26-1134 is currently Signed Into Law. The latest official action came on 04/27/2026: Governor Signed.

That means the legislative process is complete and the bill is now law. The remaining questions are about implementation timing and how agencies, businesses, or local governments respond.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does HB26-1134 do?
This law makes sure that people facing charges in local city courts have the same basic rights and protections as those in state courts, like guaranteed access to a public defender. It also requires city courts to livestream their proceedings online, especially for defendants currently stuck in jail, and stops certain small city courts from sentencing people to jail time.
What is the current status of HB26-1134?
HB26-1134 is currently "Signed Into Law" in the 2026 Regular Session. It was introduced by Javier Mabrey and is assigned to the Judiciary committee.
Who sponsors HB26-1134?
HB26-1134 is sponsored by Javier Mabrey, Elizabeth Velasco, Judy Amabile, Mike Weissman.
What committee is reviewing HB26-1134?
HB26-1134 is assigned to the Judiciary committee in the Colorado House.
When was HB26-1134 last updated?
The last action on HB26-1134 was "Governor Signed" on 04/27/2026.

Related Bills